It is time for me to renew our van’s license plates. I’m considering the internet option to accomplish that task. The State of Michigan allows that. It would seem to be quite expedient. No lines at the Secretary of State Office to wait in. No check to write. Just log in, give them a Credit Card number and they’ll ship the tabs. Very simple.
Simplicity costs money though. There’s a $2 processing fee for on-line renewal. What’s to process? The fee is only applicable to internet processing. I’m already paying an internet access fee with my phone bill so it’s not justifiable as processing the communication.
Would it then be for some physical processing—like a handling fee associated with internet purchase shipping. That’s not reasonable as there is no “handling processing” of the tabs if I order them by mail. Could it be for “handling” the keyboard? Seriously? Two bucks to click a mouse but it’s free processing to tear open an envelope with my mail ordered tabs?
I’m mystified as to what the $2 processing fee covers. Other than two computers talking for a few nano-seconds, all other incurred costs would be identical whether I apply for my tabs electronically or with paperwork via United States Postal Services. And USPS processing is paid for with the stamp.
So then, what is the difference between processing a mail and internet order for renewal of our plates? Ah, wait a minute. There is one other aspect I have not considered yet. That is the methodical processing of the means of payment. Mail order: paper check. Internet: electronic check, commonly referred to as Credit Card. However, as before, paper processing is far more labor intensive than electronic. Credit Card processing via the internet is entirely electronic. A person must process the check. Why not charge the two dollars if I walk into the SOS office? That would seem just slightly more reasonable for the $2 fee go to offset the salary of a human actually working rather than memory a chip factually recalling my creditability?
If I was mystified before, now I am baffled. How does the State of Michigan rationalize the $2 Processing Fee?
That’s a rhetorical question. It’s not one that I’m hopeful you can answer. However, if you would like to submit your theory, you may do so in one of three ways. Of course, you are always welcome to stop by the house and chat personally (you won’t even have to take a number). Or you can jot me a note and snail mail it to me for price of a postage stamp. Third. If you prefer to respond via e-mail or Facebook, please include your credit card number so I can charge your account a $2 processing fee.
Yes, I do know that this is Saturday, not Friday. But it is a four day weekend and I was really busy yesterday. I had a procedure accomplished on my foot.
I now have a much clearer picture of “minimally invasive.” Envision a nail in your heel. No, not stepping on a nail. More like a 6-penny nail driven half way across your heel bone…4 times.
It matters not that my foot was on euphoric drugs, imagining how dirt must feel with night crawlers burrowing in. It is of little consequence that the “burning” from that numbing needle could only be measured in seconds. It was still comparable to just a one-second contact with a frying pan.
Oh, and there are two of those shots. One just slightly beneath my calloused heel. The second “firing” from the injection was clearly designed to sear the tender meat deep within my heel.
This was just the beginning minutes of the “procedure”. Today, it stretches my imagination of how to differentiate between “procedure” and surgery.
If it’s the size of the incision/hole, yesterday’s “procedural hole” was definitely NOT simply the insertion of a scope, yet the sensation I’m having this morning is akin to arthroscopic SURGERY.
Furthermore, I’ve often thought that any medical action ending in …otomy was surgical removal of something undesirable. All things considered, I am now recovering from Percutaneous Ultrasonic FasciOTOMY (otherwise known as SURGERY.)
I am ambulatory (went to a baseball game last night) in my boot. I have no regrets for having this done even though the “day-after pain” is comparable to a hangover headache in my heel.
The surgeon is confident of full, distress-free recovery, and I got to see the “videos” of his vacuum cleaner inside my heel. REALLY! It was a super-sucker tube removing backwash of supersonic vibrations of the scar tissue of my Plantar Fasciitis. Very interesting. All in all, I’m frivolously happy lounging while watching college football tapings.